| Re: [europa-build-workshop] CBI |
On Mon, 2006-27-11 at 13:48 -0800, Bjorn Freeman-Benson wrote: > What would you like to say? Ward and Denis and I are actively reading > everything that goes by and I guess we are "the Foundation"... I was referring to the work item we decided on of writing a report of what we recommend for a CBI - something formal that could be presented at a financial planning meeting. If it were up to me, I'd recommend that the foundation undertake the creation of something like I outlined in the previous image. This would require at least one person, but in my dream world the foundation would think this was useful and would hire someone with its buckets of cash :) Of course, I realize that's a big expense and that the foundation has typically rejected actually writing any code, but I honestly can't think of any negatives that could come from implementing such a system. I guess people could argue that they're already getting by with internal machines and processes, but I see no reason those would have to go away. In my dream world, I see the CBI becoming so good that over time every team would *want* to use it :) I realize, however, that it's not just up to me and that my dream world doesn't exactly match reality. So I was questioning whether or not we should write a report at all seeing as Nick's work is progressing and could probably be extracted to a decent CBI. I guess I just think that the foundation should undertake something like this as it does things like facilitating project work and encouraging openness and all that jazz :) Andrew
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part