Re: [epp-dev] Combining C/C++ IDEs (was: Juno M3...)

["Schaefer, Doug" <Doug.Schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I worry about how reliable those things are but if they are fixed, then that would be great. I can't remember the exact issue. Was it an issue with how the EPP package works or was it a p2 problem?

The other side of issue is whether we want to keep the Linux Developer branding on it. Part of that is wondering whether Linux developers are picking the base C/C++ developer because it's higher in the list and they see it first, in which case they were fine without the Linux branding. Need a product manager to decide that I guess :).

Doug.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: epp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:epp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Andrew Overholt
> Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 11:12 AM
> To: Eclipse Packaging Project
> Subject: Re: [epp-dev] Juno M3...
> 
> * Schaefer, Doug <Doug.Schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2011-11-11 10:00]:
> > Could this be as simple as not showing the C/C++ IDE for Linux on the
> > download page, just as we don’t show the C/C++ IDE for Linux on the
> Window/Mac pages?
> 
> I'm very much in favour of combining them.  In the past there were issues
> due to the os= requirements in some features.  I don't recall the details but if
> we could get past those, I'd love to see the packages combined.
> 
> Andrew
> _______________________________________________
> epp-dev mailing list
> epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epp-dev