|Re: [epl-discuss] Next Round of Proposed Revisions to the EPL|
No, the inclusion of "documentation source" was intentional. It is there largely to be consistent with EPL 1.0, which defines Contribution as:
a) in the case of the initial Contributor, the initial code and *documentation* distributed under this Agreement....
So historically, at least, the EPL has always been intended to cover both the code and the related documentation.
Does that answer your question?
Back to the top