Re: [epf-dev] EPF development process

[Per Kroll <pkroll@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Alan,

the primary info you need to understand
whether you want to get involved should be expressed in the development
plan. On top of having the one that is now posted on /epf/, we should also
make sure thac each component team has a more detailed iteration plan,
providing more guidance on what people are working on. This will allow
people to say "I can contribute to that".

Ricardo also pointed out that the Eclipse
process is the process we follow for governance.
We should use BUP for the project, since
it is the only process we currently have in EPF... :)
Naturally, if a component team develop
another process, I would recommend them to vlaidate their process by using
it, assuming it is applicable for their work (if you develop a process
for Embedded Systems, it may still be more relevant fror them to use BUP>

I think Eclipse has been very successful,
and I hope that people within Eclipse can help us to capture the culture
and practices used within Eclipse within BUP. I will briefly mention that
in my 9 min short talk at EclipseCon 2006.

Cheers

Per Kroll
STSM, Manager Methods: RUP / RMC
Project Lead: Eclipse Process Framework
Rational Software, IBM Corp
408-342-3815

Kelvin Low/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS
Sent by: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

02/16/2006 05:10 PM

Please respond to
Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc	Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject	Re: [epf-dev] EPF development process

Alan, 

I think you have clarified your question quite a bit with your response.
It's a good question and I will defer the answer to Per and the sub-team
leaders. I assume we will be using BUP but the Agile team may beg to differ...:-)

Regards, 
Kelvin 

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Kelvin Low
Software Architect
IBM Method and IC Engineering
tel:  408-342-4630
fax: 408-863-4144
email: lowk@xxxxxxxxxx


epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 02/16/2006 04:46:38 PM:

> Hi Alan, 
> 
> Hi, Kelvin, 
> 
> Are you asking about the way the EPF Java packages should be named?
> 
> Not exactly... I am trying to figure out the development process 
> adopted by commiters.You (I hope "we" nearly) are building
a 
> development process and you are not using one sw process, eg, RUP?
> Aren't there UML documents, QA audits or Testing documents? 
> 
> Please I am not trying to generate a flamewar about this issue :-)
I
> would just like to see your process, its phases and how the tasks
> are assigned to better track the development. I am really interested
> in the configuration management plan adopted. 
> 
> In the project web site, the first milestone has the following goal:
> "Legal process to be completed by initial committers". It
is fine 
> but it is much high level, so the users outside the companies 
> donating code/content do not know how to help in the development,
> where to improve the EPF Composer and so on. Can you understand what
> I am trying to say? [again my English is not so good...] 
> 
> Thank you for your reply and sorry any confusion,
> 
> -- 
> Alan Kelon Oliveira de Moraes - kelon.org
> M.Sc. Candidate in Computer Science
> Federal University of Pernambuco - Brazil 
> _______________________________________________
> epf-dev mailing list
> epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev_______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev