Re: [epf-dev] EPF development process

[Kelvin Low <lowk@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Alan,

I think you have clarified your question
quite a bit with your response. It's a good question and I will defer the
answer to Per and the sub-team leaders. I assume we will be using BUP but
the Agile team may beg to differ...:-)

Regards,
Kelvin

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Kelvin Low
Software Architect
IBM Method and IC Engineering
tel:  408-342-4630
fax: 408-863-4144
email: lowk@xxxxxxxxxx


epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 02/16/2006 04:46:38
PM:

> Hi Alan,
> 
> Hi, Kelvin, 
> 
> Are you asking about the way the EPF Java packages should be named?
> 
> Not exactly... I am trying to figure out the development process 
> adopted by commiters.You (I hope "we" nearly) are building
a 
> development process and you are not using one sw process, eg, RUP?
> Aren't there UML documents, QA audits or Testing documents? 
> 
> Please I am not trying to generate a flamewar about this issue :-)
I
> would just like to see your process, its phases and how the tasks
> are assigned to better track the development. I am really interested
> in the configuration management plan adopted. 
> 
> In the project web site, the first milestone has the following goal:
> "Legal process to be completed by initial committers". It
is fine 
> but it is much high level, so the users outside the companies 
> donating code/content do not know how to help in the development,
> where to improve the EPF Composer and so on. Can you understand what
> I am trying to say? [again my English is not so good...] 
> 
> Thank you for your reply and sorry any confusion,
> 
> -- 
> Alan Kelon Oliveira de Moraes - kelon.org
> M.Sc. Candidate in Computer Science
> Federal University of Pernambuco - Brazil 
> _______________________________________________
> epf-dev mailing list
> epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev