Re: [emft-dev] Galileo status

[Laurent Goubet <laurent.goubet@xxxxxxx>]

Hi Ed,

The reason of this mail wasn't to whine about such or such people not 
taking responsibility as I myself didn't take a look at these bugs :). I 
merely wanted to ensure that we indeed needed to comment the bugs, and 
I'll get to it now that you confirmed it.

Here we go for the chain-commenting of bugs :p.

Thanks,

Laurent Goubet
Obeo

Ed Merks a écrit :
> Laurent,
>
> Unfortunately I've let quite a few of my responsibilities slip in the 
> last while.  These bugs really need comments from all the EMFT 
> components that are on the train and I'm simply not in the mood to be 
> herding cats so folks need to take responsibility for commenting about 
> their status on these bugs.  That's Compare, Ecore Tools, and Mint...  
> Once all three have commented on any specific bug I can resolve it...
>
> Thanks for asking about it!
>
> Regards,
> Ed
>
>
> Laurent Goubet wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > As I was clearing our bugs for EMFT Compare I realized our status for 
> > the galileo train hasn't been updated since the M4 artifacts : 
> > http://www.eclipse.org/projects/galileo_status.php . All these bugs 
> > have been raised against EMFT / releng instead of "once per 
> > component" has seen on M2T for example. How are we supposed to deal 
> > with them? I had started commenting on some of these bugs for Compare 
> > so that Ed (I think he's the one in charge of closing these?) would 
> > know that component was green, but I wonder whether this is what's 
> > expected of us.
> >
> > Any insight on the status of these bugs? Compare surely isn't the 
> > only EMFT component that wants to be part of the train?
> >
> > Laurent Goubet
> > Obeo
> > _______________________________________________
> > emft-dev mailing list
> > emft-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/emft-dev