| Re: [ejb-dev] [cdi-dev] Moving optional EJB tests from CDI to be required tests of EJB |
- I'm all for the downstream container tests moving into the container projects. We have touched on this in previous discussions about cleaning up circularity between specs and TCKs.
- Those numbers don't add up with what I currently count on the cdi-tck main branch where the tests have been split into a set of core tests that don't have downstream api dependencies (servlet, ejb, transactions, jus, ...) and a web profile set of tests. I count 1322 in the core and 658 in the web for a total of 1980 currently. Counting just @Test (which is what I did as well) will over count because some test classes have this annotation at both the class and method level, but
- Can you find an example of an EJB test you don't think is being run in the web/platform runs?
+1, I'll take a look also.
- I'm fine with pulling the current EJB related tests and moving them somewhere. Just need to know where.
On Aug 25, 2021 at 4:25:45 PM, David Blevins <dblevins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm mentioning something I don't really have the time to work on myself at this time, but it still should be brought up.
There are EJB-specific spec requirements in the CDI spec. There are a few hundred tests in the CDI TCK that are for EJB specifically and enforce these requirements. From a CDI perspective all these requirements and tests are optional.
CDI became a permanent dependency of EJB in EJB 3.1. It is somewhat indirect, but that's how the math works out; you can't have an EJB implementation that does not support CDI including CDI decorators. Therefore, from an EJB perspective all these "optional" tests are actually required. No one should be allowed to claim Jakarta EE Web Profile or Platform compliance without passing these EJB+CDI integration tests.
At the moment it's difficult to tell who if anyone is running these tests. I count 2,767 uses of org.testng.annotations.Test in the CDI TCK, yet I see most our certification requests for Web Profile and Platform show 1796 CDI tests run. It seems we've all overlooked them -- in fairness they are marked optional.
What do people think about moving these EJB-specific requirements and tests into the EJB spec and TCK and marking them required?
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
_______________________________________________ cdi-dev mailing list cdi-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev