Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [egit-dev] Bug 296187

Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
> That's because the two changes didn't include a "Bug: nnn\n" line
> in their commit messages, so I assumed there was no bug associated.
> So I didn't try to search for one, or close it.  I just don't have
> that kind of time... and this is why Robin and I don't like opening
> bugs for stuff that's just quicker to write the code for.  :-)

I fully agree :~)

> Quite frankly, Git is going to produce more accurate reporting,
> and won't require us to tick those +iplog flags everywhere.
> We just have to make sure we only accept patches through Gerrit,
> and that the Author field is correctly populated.

+1, I like this approach :-)


Back to the top