|Re: [ee4j-community] Status of JPA migration|
On 4/7/18 11:13 AM, Jens Schauder wrote:
> I find it confusing that the status page
> https://www.eclipse.org/ee4j/status.php doesn't mention JPA.
> It has a row for EclipseLink, but that is AFAIK only the reference
AFAIK in case of JPA there has been no standalone spec-provided API for
quite long time with reasoning behind that that "the API is
implementation specific and should be provided by vendors/spec
implementations" - in case of EclipseLink the repo with API is one of
the repositories managed by eclipselink project.
> Or is the specification and the TCK now part of EclipseLink?
I believe that it has been clearly communicated by others that specs and
TCK's as such are being/will be handled separately; these have never
been part of EclipseLink, nor managed by it.
> Could someone shed some light on this?
> ee4j-community mailing list
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
ee4j-community mailing list
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
Java Champion, JCP EC/EG Member, EE4J PMC, JUG Leader