[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ee4j-community] Jakarta EE logo selection process - next steps
- From: "Markus KARG" <markus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 20:17:59 +0100
- Delivered-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Organization: Markus KARG, Staatl. gepr. Inf.
- Thread-index: AdPC2i7vr8dnJ7tzROGGGwwb0Vp/PAAAV7+A
I understood the original mail in a way that from all submissions the EF
removed everything but left over only four due to a pre-selection by their
*marketing* team (not *legal* team).
[mailto:ee4j-community-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Heiko W. Rupp
Sent: Freitag, 23. März 2018 20:07
To: EE4J community discussions
Subject: Re: [ee4j-community] Jakarta EE logo selection process - next steps
On 23 Mar 2018, at 18:35, Markus KARG wrote:
> I second that. The EF should simply remove those logos which are
> legally problematic, and then let the community vote for their
> favorite. This is a community project, and
Isn't that what
| > * We will hold a community vote to determine which of these
| > final candidate logos should be the chosen logo.
I understand Paul that the EF needs to (to quote you) "remove those logos
which are legally problematic", which is done by the marketing team, as they
know this process of removal best.
But then I may be wrong.
ee4j-community mailing list
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from
this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-community