Hi Clement,
My mail client decided that your email was a new thread, so I've copied your email below to include it in this thread.
I'm ready to make a start on this immediately. At some point in future, I'm guessing there would be a clear way for this to get going, it would come under the umbrella of some committee, a place for the effort to live might be decided, etc, but we're not there yet obviously, committees aren't appointed/elected yet. I propose that we don't let that hinder us, and instead we create a GitHub repo (doesn't have to be in the Eclipse foundation), and work on the guidelines in a README there. We can use GitHub as a place to discuss the minutiae, and use this mailing list/email thread to discuss broader issues, with regular updates posted here to keep the community informed. At some point in future, when the right structures are in place, the guidelines can be officially adopted (probably with further changes after review) by the Jakarta EE working group (or whichever committee is relevant).
Does anyone have any objections to that approach?
Regards,
James
On 19 March 2018 at 00:57, clement escoffier <clement.escoffier@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:(I tried to reply to an existing thread that happened before I subscribed to this list, hopefully, it won't mess up everything, especially archives)
Hello,
I think that writing some kind of guidelines answering the questions listed by James would be greatly beneficial. In a first version, it could focus on the API (Reactive Streams, CompletionStage...). Topics such as execution model, the relation with CDI can also be covered, maybe in a second step.
James, if you are still thinking about writing these guidelines, you can count on my help.
Clement