[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ee4j-community] [eclipse.org-membership-at-large] Proposed EE.next Working Group
- From: Mike Milinkovich <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 12:25:11 -0500
- Delivered-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
On 2018-02-06 12:07 PM, Werner Keil wrote:
shows, LJC, SouJava and other not-for-profit organizations like the
Meruvian Foundation by the late Frans Thamura are Associate Members
and even they (not to mention Individuals unless they pay at least
1500$ to become a Solutions Member) would be prohibited.
We will discuss the idea of including JUGs. I've seen first hand what a
force for good LJC and SouJava have been on the JCP.
Individuals can participate at no cost if they are committers. Note that
we anticipate that the individuals involved in working on a spec will
all be committers on that spec project. So if you're on the future
equivalent of an expert group, you will be able to participate in
EE.next as a committer member.