| Re: [eclipselink-users] Cascade.PERSIST marked List is not getting persited when Parent Object is persisted |
I think this was something fixed in EclipseLink 1.1, could you try this release. The issue was that when you add to a lazy collection the collection records the add, but avoid fetching the collection. However the persist() was not traversing the collection because it thought it was not fetched, but needs to traverse the added elements. If you instantiate the collection first (i.e. send it size() or make it EAGER, then it would work). You could also call persist on the object that was added, instead of the Customer. t3_chris wrote: > > Hello James! > > I've just reproduced the thing mentioned in a new clean project. The bug > keeps occuring also in the simple demo project. > > I filed an issue which includes the demo project. > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=270714 > > Best Regards, > christian > ----- --- http://wiki.eclipse.org/User:James.sutherland.oracle.com James Sutherland http://www.eclipse.org/eclipselink/ EclipseLink , http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/ias/toplink/ TopLink Wiki: http://wiki.eclipse.org/EclipseLink EclipseLink , http://wiki.oracle.com/page/TopLink TopLink Forums: http://forums.oracle.com/forums/forum.jspa?forumID=48 TopLink , http://www.nabble.com/EclipseLink-f26430.html EclipseLink Book: http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Java_Persistence Java Persistence -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Cascade.PERSIST-marked-List-is-not-getting-persited-when-Parent-Object-is-persisted-tp22717289p22827161.html Sent from the EclipseLink - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.