| Re: [eclipselink-users] Cascade.PERSIST marked List is not getting persited when Parent Object is persisted |
Not exactly sure what you are doing, could you please include your code for your transaction. In general you must read an object in the transaction context before modifying it. t3_chris wrote: > > Hi! > > I've got a strange Problem: > > I have 3 Classes: > > "Customer" contains a list of objects of type "Vendingmachine" and > "Vendingmachine" contains a list objects of "VendingmachineEvent". > > Vendingmachine within Customer is marked "cascade=CascadeType.ALL", > "fetch=FetchType.LAZY" > VendingmachineEvent within Vendingmachine is marked > "cascade=CascadeType.ALL" > > When i now add an Element to vendingmachine.lifecycleEvents by calling > lifecycleEvents.add(x) (where x is a Object of type VendingmachineEvent) > it doesn't get saved to the database when i call persist on Customer. > > When in in contrast read all VendingmachineEvents before doing the persist > the Events get persisted to the Database as expected. > > That seems very strange to me! Why do i have to read out the elements to > have them saved to the db? > > Best regards, > > christian > ----- --- http://wiki.eclipse.org/User:James.sutherland.oracle.com James Sutherland http://www.eclipse.org/eclipselink/ EclipseLink , http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/ias/toplink/ TopLink Wiki: http://wiki.eclipse.org/EclipseLink EclipseLink , http://wiki.oracle.com/page/TopLink TopLink Forums: http://forums.oracle.com/forums/forum.jspa?forumID=48 TopLink , http://www.nabble.com/EclipseLink-f26430.html EclipseLink Book: http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Java_Persistence Java Persistence -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Cascade.PERSIST-marked-List-is-not-getting-persited-when-Parent-Object-is-persisted-tp22717289p22723842.html Sent from the EclipseLink - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.