RE: [eclipselink-users] autocommit required?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

RE: [eclipselink-users] autocommit required?

From: James Mello <james.mello@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 12:59:42 -0800
Accept-language: en-US
Acceptlanguage: en-US
Delivered-to: eclipselink-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/eclipselink-users>
List-help: <mailto:eclipselink-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-users>, <mailto:eclipselink-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-users>, <mailto:eclipselink-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Thread-index: Aclvd/7hSMY/lYVhTpmP+mgjnAXvEgAAHkWw
Thread-topic: [eclipselink-users] autocommit required?

Nothing probably wrong with the pool, but are you using an external transaction manager? If not, this would explain this behavior...

From: eclipselink-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:eclipselink-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Carl Hall
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 12:56 PM
To: EclipseLink User Discussions
Subject: [eclipselink-users] autocommit required?

I'm using DBCP for my connection pooling and have found that I can't seem to find my entities after loading if I don't set autocommit=true. If I use an EL internal datasource, this isn't required. Does the EL datasource have autocommit set to true or am I missing something in my pool setup?

References:
- [eclipselink-users] autocommit required?
  - From: Carl Hall

Prev by Date: [eclipselink-users] autocommit required?
Next by Date: Re: [eclipselink-users] two instances of same object in an indirectList ?
Previous by thread: [eclipselink-users] autocommit required?
Next by thread: [eclipselink-users] Eclipse RCP - EntityManagerFactory == null
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs