Re: [eclipselink-users] @BasicCollection non storing Integer type

[astarte <g.turek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thank you! Using column definition worked. is this a bug then? If it is I'll
report it
gaby


James Sutherland wrote:
> 
> I assume you mean the default table creation is creating a VARCHAR column,
> instead of NUMBER?
> 
> You can configure this by setting the columnDefinition of the @Column,
> although it seems like it should work from the code.
> 
> Or are you trying to store it as a VARCHAR in the database and Integer is
> Java?  If so then you can use a Converter.
> 
> 
> 
> astarte wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> My code:
>> 
>>  @BasicCollection(valueColumn = @Column(name = "ALARM"))
>>  @CollectionTable(name = "SETTINGS_ALARMS", primaryKeyJoinColumns =
>> {@PrimaryKeyJoinColumn(name = "SETTINGS_ID", referencedColumnName =
>> "ID")})
>>   private Set<Integer> alarms = new HashSet<Integer>();
>> 
>>   public Set<Integer> getAlarms()
>>   {
>>     return Collections.unmodifiableSet(alarms);
>>   }
>>   public void addAlarm(int alarm)
>>   {
>>     alarms.add(alarm);
>>   }
>> 
>> However the values of alarms are stored as strings. Has anyone
>> experienced this?
>> Thank you
>> gaby
>> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/%40BasicCollection-non-storing-Integer-type-tp19753488p19767897.html
Sent from the EclipseLink - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.