[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [eclipselink-users] BaseEntity
|
Yes, this should be possible. If your MappedSuperclass is as defined
below you should not be getting any errors. Are the errors limited to
the inheritance case that you asked about before?
--Gordon
Leon Derks wrote:
Hello
Is it possible to have one single BaseEntity class that contains a
general used id for all other entity classes?
Like this:
@MappedSuperclass
public abstract class BaseEntity {
@Id
@GeneratedValue(generator="seqGen")
@SequenceGenerator(name="seqGen",sequenceName="PLI_SEQ",
allocationSize=1)
private long id;
public long getId() {
return id;
}
And that all my entity classes are extending from this BaseEntity.
Because then I don't need all kind of similar id variables in my
entity classes.
I tried this, but it results in an error. Because it wants to select
from the table BaseEntity and this doesn't exists of course.
Am I doing something wrong with my jpa mapping?
greetz,
Leon
_______________________________________________
eclipselink-users mailing list
eclipselink-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-users
