| Re: [eclipselink-dev] VM Managed EM feature (214661) |
|
Thanks for the feedback Mike, 1. No, it would be very difficult to switch this dynamically. Perhaps a future consideration. 2. ok, makes sense - done 3. only for FORCED_WEAK. and I have updated the java doc with a note saying changes could be lost 4. Perhaps but even with the link they will not know they are using it (weaving) but it is mentioned in WEAK so I will add link. --Gordon MICHAEL.KEITH@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: Nice feature. - Is there a dynamic API to set this option on an EM? This would be nice for those extended PC EMs that one gets from SFSB... - I would name the property: eclipselink.persistence-context.reference-mode - If an object is not change-tracked then isn’t there the possibility that it will be gc’ed and the change discarded? If this is indeed the case then we need a better warning on the FORCE_WEAK option explaining this, since this could be unexpected and bad. - It would be nice to have a reference to change tracking javadoc, since a user of this option may not be completely aware/familiar with whether or not they are using change tracking and which option to use, etc.-----Original Message----- From: GORDON.YORKE@xxxxxxxxxx Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 9:42 PM To: Dev mailing list for Eclipse Persistence Services Subject: [eclipselink-dev] VM Managed EM feature (214661) https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=214661 http://wiki.eclipse.org/EclipseLink/DesignDocs/214661 I have updated the feature doc and the patch file based on feedback from James Sutherland. If no one else has any concerns I will check in this feature Friday May 2, 2008 --Gordon _______________________________________________ eclipselink-dev mailing list eclipselink-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-dev_______________________________________________ eclipselink-dev mailing list eclipselink-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-dev |