Re: [eclipselink-dev] EclipseLink dependencies

[Tom Ware <tom.ware@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Are we allowed to append this to the initial contribution bug?

Mike Norman wrote:

> Doug Clarke wrote:
>
> > I would consider this code to be part of the EclipseLink testing 
> > source that should have been contributed in our initial contribution.
> >  
> > How much code is it?
> >
> >     -----Original Message-----
> >     *From:* eclipselink-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >     [mailto:eclipselink-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]*On Behalf Of *Mike
> >     Norman
> >     *Sent:* Thursday, July 19, 2007 10:20 AM
> >     *To:* Dev mailing list for Eclipse Persistence Services
> >     *Subject:* Re: [eclipselink-dev] EclipseLink dependancies
> >
> >     Tom Ware wrote:
> >
> > > Are we filling requests for the testing-only jars?assume we do not need to do this for JUnit.
> >     I have a custom extension to JUnit4 (junit4-ext-pb4.jar - .java
> >     and .class files); do we
> >     need to do any IP work for it?
> Only the core tests (and its underlying framework) was added. DBWS 
> uses JUnit4 with an extension to manage ADE .properties
> files (titl.properties, env.properties - actually, it works outside of 
> ADE and the .properties files could be call anything.properties)
>
> 15 Java source files, 1 antlib.xml file => compiles to 22 .class files
>
> --
> Oracle Email Signature Logo
> Mike Norman | Principal Software Designer | 613.288.4638
> Oracle Server Technologies | TopLink Product
> 45 O'Connor Street, Suite 400 | Ottawa, ON K1P 1A4 | (fax) 613.238.2818
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> eclipselink-dev mailing list
> eclipselink-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-dev
>