Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [eclipselink-dev] EclipseLink dependencies

Are we allowed to append this to the initial contribution bug?

Mike Norman wrote:

Doug Clarke wrote:

I would consider this code to be part of the EclipseLink testing source that should have been contributed in our initial contribution. How much code is it?

    -----Original Message-----
    *From:* eclipselink-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
    [mailto:eclipselink-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]*On Behalf Of *Mike
    *Sent:* Thursday, July 19, 2007 10:20 AM
    *To:* Dev mailing list for Eclipse Persistence Services
    *Subject:* Re: [eclipselink-dev] EclipseLink dependancies

    Tom Ware wrote:

Are we filling requests for the testing-only jars?assume we do not need to do this for JUnit.

    I have a custom extension to JUnit4 (junit4-ext-pb4.jar - .java
    and .class files); do we
    need to do any IP work for it?

Only the core tests (and its underlying framework) was added. DBWS uses JUnit4 with an extension to manage ADE .properties files (, - actually, it works outside of ADE and the .properties files could be call

15 Java source files, 1 antlib.xml file => compiles to 22 .class files

Oracle Email Signature Logo
Mike Norman | Principal Software Designer | 613.288.4638
Oracle Server Technologies | TopLink Product
45 O'Connor Street, Suite 400 | Ottawa, ON K1P 1A4 | (fax) 613.238.2818


eclipselink-dev mailing list

Back to the top