| [eclipsecon-na-program-committee] Here come the real work: please rate talks |
| Hi all, I've created a spreadsheet with talks already submitted so everyone can start to rate them (https://goo.gl/CMcD11). As we already have a 100s of talks and as we have an extended deadline, we will skip the initial sifting phase (i.e. no +1/0/-1 vote). We will go straight to the final PC voting. On the spreadsheet linked above, you have 2 sheets to care of: "Standard talks" and "Tutorials". There is one column for each of you (TLA as below): AKU: Alex BDA: Brian CAN: Chris CBR: Cédric DTO: Dalibor JKO: Jan JBI: Jay Jay MBA: Mikael MKO: Maximilian MLI: Martin PRA: Pascal SKA: Simon Please fill this column with your rate for each talk. As a reminder, you should rate a talk from 1 to 5 (no 0 to stay coherent with community voting rating system) with the following meaning: 1: The talk is off topic and does not aim at the proper conference or is a sales pitch. 2: The abstract is quite cryptic and you don’t really understand what it will be about. 3: Somewhat interesting. 4: Interesting talk. 5: You love it. If you see a conflict of interest for a talk, please put an X instead of a rate. I will not add new submissions before the end of the extended deadline. I suggest you start to rate the talks early so you won't have the full program to read and to rate in a few days after the ext. deadline ;) If you have any question or issue with the sheet, feel free to ask. Thanks. Mikael PS: I've excluded the "IoT day" submissions as they will be chosen by a parallel PC. |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail