| Re: [eclipsecon-na-program-committee] Suggested criteria for judging science projects |
Thanks Jay! It looks good to me. Do you confirm that only these 4 projects https://projects.eclipse.org/wg/science/projects are part of the Sc. WG? Are there any awaiting proposals that we should be aware of? Thanks. Mikael > Le 26 oct. 2015 à 19:20, Jay Jay Billings <jayjaybillings@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit : > > Everyone, > > I updated our working document to add some suggested criteria for judging Science projects. Please feel free to modify it as you see fit - I'm not terrible attached to any of it. > > The important thing for me is that these criteria help you to adequately judge science proposals and that they help us to find novel topics. (We definitely want to make sure that we get new blood presenting in SWG!) > > Jay > > -- > Jay Jay Billings > Oak Ridge National Laboratory > Twitter Handle: @jayjaybillings > _______________________________________________ > eclipsecon-na-program-committee mailing list > eclipsecon-na-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipsecon-na-program-committee
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail