Eike,
It you don’t know about a session then I would suggest to not vote at all. If you vote 3 that will impact the overall average of a session so that session could get selected even though you didn’t have an opinion.
Ian
From: eclipsecon-na-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:eclipsecon-na-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Eike Stepper
Sent: November-05-14 12:10 PM
To: Eclipsecon NA program committee discussions
Subject: Re: [eclipsecon-na-program-committee] the votes and the stars
Am 05.11.2014 um 17:09 schrieb Ian Bull:
Yes, I use the following
5: Absolute Accept (for me)
4: Should be in the program
1: Absolute Reject (for me)
0: No vote (either no vote yet, or really no opinion -- although try to vote on most of the talks).
I used "0" (zero) really just as a reminder (helpful when sorting by my own vote; my "todos" are always at the top) that i haven't voted for a talk, yet. Those that I looked at and couldn't develop an opinion I voted "3" for in the end. I think that fits nicer into the 1 to 5 ordering. So that would make:
5: Absolute Accept (for me)
4: Should be in the program
1: Absolute Reject (for me)
What do you think?
Cheers
/Eike
----
http://www.esc-net.de
http://thegordian.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/eikestepper
I try not to look at other votes when I'm choosing. I think it's good if everyone gave their own vote, not influenced by others.
Once we've all done this we'll likely find a natural boundary (talks above a certain value will be accepted). After this the fun begins :-). We can look for talks that some PC members thought should be rejected but are in, or talks that other members gave a 5 star that are currently out. Moving around these talks will be the purpose of our meetings later this month.
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Martin Lippert <mlippert@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hey!
As we are starting to vote on the sessions for EclipseCon NA 2015 using the submission system (and some of you already began, which is great), I would like to coordinate the votes a little bit, especially the meaning of the 0-5 star votes - just to make sure that we are all on the same page.
Ian (B.) could you explain the meaning of the stars that you used last time (and I guess you used already for your votes on next years session)? I guess it is something around 5-star means “must have in the program”, and 1 star means “definitely reject”, with zero stars “not voted on”, but it would be great to reach some kind of common sense about this.
Thanks!!!
Cheers,
-Martin
_______________________________________________
eclipsecon-na-program-committee mailing list
eclipsecon-na-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipsecon-na-program-committee
--
_______________________________________________
eclipsecon-na-program-committee mailing list
eclipsecon-na-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipsecon-na-program-committee
