Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [eclipsecon-na-program-committee] Talk rejection

For having been part of the ECE program committee, writing the rejection comment is not a huge amount of work as long as we capture comments during the review phase.

Le 01/10/2013 09:38, Anne Jacko a écrit :
I may have said this already, but the ECE program committee has done this for the last two years. Each declined talk includes a comment -- sometimes that comment is "we liked your talk but we just didn't have enough space for all the ones we liked."

The PC divides up the work of leaving the comments, so that no one gets stuck with too much work.

These comments are included in the text of the Decline emails, and submitters are invited to email for even more info if they like. Only a few do that. But they all seem to really appreciate being told why their talk was rejected. In theory it encourages people to try again, and we always need new submitters!

Anne Jacko
Eclipse Foundation
503-784-3788 (cell)



On Oct 1, 2013, at 12:15 AM, Eike Stepper wrote:

Am 01.10.2013 09:06, schrieb Lars Vogel:

I find that difficult. Frequently its not that I reject a talk, its more that I picked others.

Even more important and polite to tell the submitter that his proposal wasn't that bad, but wasn't picked because of slot limitations ;-)

Cheers
/Eike

----
http://www.esc-net.de
http://thegordian.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/eikestepper


Best regards, Lars

Am 01.10.2013 08:01 schrieb "Eike Stepper" <stepper@xxxxxxxxxx>:
I totally agree!

Cheers
/Eike

----
http://www.esc-net.de
http://thegordian.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/eikestepper


Am 01.10.2013 05:19, schrieb Pascal Rapicault:
Tonight, I've learn that the Jazoon conference provides feedback when your talk is rejected (one or two sentence explaining the reason).
I find that to be a good idea, and it is more polite way to decline a talk than a blunt "generic rejection" notice. After all, people have tons of venues to present their talk at, they take time to write their abstract, so I think it would be good if we could explain why their talk is rejected. I understand it takes more time, but it should not be more than writing down the thoughts that we have in our minds.

wdyt?

_______________________________________________
eclipsecon-na-program-committee mailing list
eclipsecon-na-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipsecon-na-program-committee


_______________________________________________
eclipsecon-na-program-committee mailing list
eclipsecon-na-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipsecon-na-program-committee


_______________________________________________
eclipsecon-na-program-committee mailing list
eclipsecon-na-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipsecon-na-program-committee

_______________________________________________
eclipsecon-na-program-committee mailing list
eclipsecon-na-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipsecon-na-program-committee



_______________________________________________
eclipsecon-na-program-committee mailing list
eclipsecon-na-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipsecon-na-program-committee


Back to the top