Re: [eclipsecon-na-program-committee] PC tags

[Sven Efftinge <sven.efftinge@xxxxxxxxx>]

2), but we don't neccessarily need to combine them. For instance, I think we can and should have more than one session about migration to Eclipse 4 but we should be aware of how many we have.

Am 20.11.2012 um 21:33 schrieb Ian Bull <irbull@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

Are these "duplicates":

1. Exact duplicates (someone accidentally hit submit twice)

2. Similar talks (we should consider combining them)

3. Duplicates from previous year (someone has just re-submitted what they had before)?

or 4. All of the above?

cheers,

ian

On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 6:24 AM, Sven Efftinge <sven.efftinge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I also noticed the tag 'dup' for duplicates on some talks and also used it twice than.

On Nov 20, 2012, at 3:17 PM, John Arthorne <John_Arthorne@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I have been trying out using the PC tag "exp" to denote experience reports from consumers/adopters, just to get a feel for how many we have in each category. Just wanted to mention so you know what those mean, and you're welcome to add them too. I also moved the wiki doc on our selection process into our main wiki page, which includes a list of the PC tags and their meaning:

https://www.eclipsecon.org/wiki/2013_Program_Committee#PC_tags

John

_______________________________________________
eclipsecon-na-program-committee mailing list
eclipsecon-na-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipsecon-na-program-committee

_______________________________________________
eclipsecon-na-program-committee mailing list
eclipsecon-na-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipsecon-na-program-committee

--
R. Ian Bull | EclipseSource Victoria | +1 250 477 7484
http://eclipsesource.com | http://twitter.com/eclipsesource

_______________________________________________
eclipsecon-na-program-committee mailing list
eclipsecon-na-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipsecon-na-program-committee