[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [eclipsecon-na-program-committee] Fwd: EclipseCon 2012: your talk has been declined
|
I agree with John's comments. I found the talk to sound interesting but
not something most attendees would have great interest in. Unfortunately
for talks like this we had many other talks to choose from that the PC felt
would generate more interest in the attendees.
Tom
From: John Arthorne <John_Arthorne@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: Eclipsecon NA program committee discussions <eclipsecon-na-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
Date: 12/06/2011 09:09 AM
Subject: Re: [eclipsecon-na-program-committee] Fwd: EclipseCon 2012: your talk has been declined
> > I read at
> > <http://ianskerrett.wordpress.com/2011/12/05/selecting-the-
> eclipsecon-program/>
> > that it's possible to get feedback on the declined proposals from the
> > PC. I submitted a proposal based on a research study that we conducted
> > on the use of Eclipse refactoring tool. We love to hear PC's feedback
> > on our proposal.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mohsen Vakilian
This is the talk:
http://www.eclipsecon.org/2012/sessions/use-disuse-and-misuse-automated-refactoring-tools
I found this talk personally interesting. I read the paper and forwarded it
on to the JDT committer team, who recently also blogged about it:
http://blog.deepakazad.com/2011/12/codingspectator-research-study-on.html
However with my PC hat on, I wondered how much of the attendees would want
to know about this. Most of the attendees are using Eclipse tools or
building RCP applications, but not actually building refactoring tools.
This felt like a very niche subject to me, and the research paper probably
communicates the findings just as well as a talk.
John_______________________________________________
eclipsecon-na-program-committee mailing list
eclipsecon-na-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipsecon-na-program-committee
