Thanks,
John. Agreed. Are there other talks you guys see that we
should be taking another look at? The JRebel one was a good
one too. Let’s keep that going and make sure we’re not
missing anything.
:D
>
"Schaefer, Doug" <Doug.Schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent by:
eclipsecon-na-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> I definitely take into account number of votes as
well, 4 actually
> being the threshold where I start to wonder about
the result. A talk
> with 8 votes makes me wonder as well, especially
the 3 factor I
> mentioned earlier. But it all depends on the
context. For example 8
> people voted for the LTTng tracing talk which is
actually an
> important new area in Linux tools and CDT. I
voted 5 and the average
> sits at 3.25. Not sure what to make of that.
That's probably an
example of a talk falling through the cracks... (7*3 +
5)/8 = 3.25. I know I gave it a 3 because it seemed
fine but not amazing. It felt like a bit of a niche
"what's new in LTTng" talk. Based on your input that
this is an important new area for CDT/LinuxTools I've
bumped my vote up to 4. I definitely think it's worth
bringing up talks that you think didn't get a fair
assessment on this list and we can revise.
John