Re: [eclipsecon-na-program-committee] Finished voting

[John Arthorne <John_Arthorne@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> "Schaefer, Doug" <Doug.Schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> Sent by: eclipsecon-na-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> I definitely take into account number of votes as well, 4 actually
> being the threshold where I start to wonder about the result. A talk
> with 8 votes makes me wonder as well, especially the 3 factor I 
> mentioned earlier. But it all depends on the context. For example
8 
> people voted for the LTTng tracing talk which is actually an 
> important new area in Linux tools and CDT. I voted 5 and the average
> sits at 3.25. Not sure what to make of that.

That's probably an example of a talk falling through
the cracks... (7*3 + 5)/8 = 3.25.  I know I gave it a 3 because it
seemed fine but not amazing. It felt like a bit of a niche "what's
new in LTTng" talk. Based on your input that this is an important
new area for CDT/LinuxTools I've bumped my vote up to 4. I definitely think
it's worth bringing up talks that you think didn't get a fair assessment
on this list and we can revise.

John