Re: [eclipsecon-na-program-committee] Finished voting

[Sven Efftinge <sven.efftinge@xxxxxxxxx>]

Just saw his bio which states that he works for Zeroturnaround.
So not independent, but maybe still good?

On Nov 22, 2011, at 8:26 AM, Sven Efftinge wrote:

> Too bad the submission lacks the speaker info. A bug in the system?
> 
> As Andrew already pointed out the speaker is Sang Shin (see the attached slides), who seems to be an independent trainer and Java evangelist :
> http://www.javapassion.com
> 
> JRebel is indeed a great technology. It won several important awards and they have support for Eclipse Plug-in Development as well.
> Given Andrew's comments I'd suggest to rethink the votes.
> 
> Sven
> 
> On Nov 22, 2011, at 8:10 AM, Gunnar Wagenknecht wrote:
> 
>> Am 21.11.2011 22:39, schrieb Sven Efftinge:
>>> I wonder why this talk has been voted down:
>>> 
>>> http://www.eclipsecon.org/2012/sessions/inner-workings-jrebel-instant-java-application-redeployment
>>> 
>>> It looks good to me.
>> 
>> I voted '2' because I'm afraid that this is promotion of non-Eclipse
>> commercial tooling. As great as the technology is, I'd rather like to
>> see the slots given to talks that are somehow connected to Eclipse
>> technology (with the exception of one or two pure Java 7 talks).
>> 
>> -Gunnar
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Gunnar Wagenknecht
>> gunnar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://wagenknecht.org/
>> _______________________________________________
>> eclipsecon-na-program-committee mailing list
>> eclipsecon-na-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipsecon-na-program-committee
> 
> _______________________________________________
> eclipsecon-na-program-committee mailing list
> eclipsecon-na-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipsecon-na-program-committee