Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [] PDT and the PHP EPP

Dawid has responded and plans to provide a fix in the next couple of days. 


On Thu., Nov. 25, 2021, 20:17 Jonah Graham, <jonah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi folks,

I have reached out privately to Dawid - PDT project lead and tester for the PHP package - to see if the below PDT issue can be resolved on time.

If it cannot, I think we should - at a minimum - pull the PHP package, and possibly the PDT project for this release. I assume pulling the PDT project from SimRel won't help for people who upgrade as the Platform will upgrade and break PDT.

The issue that is breaking PDT is that PDT is using the internal API of Adapters that has changed in this release. The PDT[1] issue is the same issue that Oomph had [2] and that signature change also affects Groovy plugins[3] and Eclipse Ceylon[4]. This was the result of a quick github code search to see who and how the adapter manager current behaviour changed in Bug 576024[5] is affecting the wider ecosystem.



Jonah Graham
Kichwa Coders

On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 at 21:36, Jonah Graham <jonah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi folks,

Another one for the list - PDT.

PDT hasn't been updated since mid 2020 and the current contribution does not work in parts with the 2021-12 release. See

IIUC this one is probably higher priority as we have an EPP download with PDT in it, the "Eclipse IDE for PHP Developers"

I have reached out to the PL (Dawid Pakuła) on that GH issue - he has been responsive recently there so hopefully we can work things out. However as PDT has not had a release in > 1 year we are running out of time to get a fix + release review etc in time.


Jonah Graham
Kichwa Coders

On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 at 10:06, Jonah Graham <jonah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello fellow Planning Council members,

Wayne's recent email about simrel participation highlighted some projects that may need a review in terms of participation full email is below, but these projects may need a review in regards to their participation:

- Eclipse Mylyn
- Eclipse EGF
- Eclipse XWT
- Eclipse Papyrus
- Eclipse Data Tools
- Eclipse ACTF

If anyone knows about or can tackle some of the above easily, please do so and let us know.


Jonah Graham
Kichwa Coders

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Wayne Beaton <wayne.beaton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 at 00:12
Subject: [cross-project-issues-dev] 2021-12 project participation
To: Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Greetings Simultaneous Release Participants!

It's that time of the quarter again.

Please have a look at the participation page. If I have something wrong, please let me know. 

I've made my usual best guesses at what version of each project's software will be included in the 2021-12 simultaneous release. Based on what I see in the simrel repository, though, I think that a few of you need to create release records for your contributions.

If your project is pushing a new version and I have the wrong version selected, please ensure that you have created a release record with the correct version number and date. If that's in place, then please respond to this thread with the correct version information (or just send me a separate note).

If your project is contributing a major or minor release and has not engaged in a progress or release review within one year of the release date, then please engage the EMO ASAP to schedule a review.

Note that even if you do not need to engage in a progress or release review, you are responsible for ensuring that the intellectual property due diligence process has been completed for all of the contents of your release. If you have open CQs for content that will be included in the release, please reach out to emo-records@xxxxxxxxxxx to request that they expedite processing.

If you haven't yet, consider trying the Eclipse Dash License Tool to review the license state of your project's third party content.

Remember that you do not need to submit your IP Log for review if you are not engaging in a progress or release review. If you are uncertain about the status of your project's intellectual property, you can submit the IP Log with a comment requesting that the EMO review your project for conformance (when you submit an IP Log for review, the EMO will assume that you're initiating a release review unless you indicate otherwise).

I've noticed a few things...

Several Eclipse Mylyn features are disabled. Is this a problem? What is the status of this? It feels a little late to be asking this question, but will Eclipse Mylyn be updated in time to be included in the release?

Eclipse EGF dropped out starting with the 2021-09 release. Can/should somebody remove the aggrcon file?

Eclipse XWT and Eclipse Papyrus have been reactivated in the repository. In June, these projects "decided to opt out of the train for this release". To the best of my knowledge, opting out completely (that is, not contributing even old bits) of a release is unprecedented, so I'm not sure what (if anything) special needs to be done here. AFAICT, nobody from the Planning Council expressed any concerns in response to the declaration from the project teams, so I've added them back in. Please let me know if this is a problem. AFAICT there is no release record for Eclipse XWT that corresponds to this release.

There are some very old components in the simultaneous release. The Eclipse Data Tools features are, AFAICT, more than three years old. Eclipse ACTF is more than four years old. Are these features being tested? Is there anybody on this list representing the interests of these projects?

Thanks for your attention.


Wayne Beaton

Director of Open Source Projects | Eclipse Foundation

cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe from this list, visit

Back to the top