Re: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Notes from today's PC meeting, 10/5/2

[Doug Schaefer <dschaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 2016-10-05, 4:23 PM, "eclipse.org-planning-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
on behalf of David Williams"
<eclipse.org-planning-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of
david_williams@xxxxxxx> wrote:

>I have included my notes in the agenda from today, at
>
>https://wiki.eclipse.org/Planning_Council/October_05_2016
>
>PC Members, please fix anything I omitted or got wrong.
>
>Additionally, for those not at the meeting:
>
>   Wayne, can you comment if the "New and Noteworthy" for Neon.1 is done?
>
>   Doug, can you comment if you are still willing to lead an effort to
>decide and describe exactly what it means to require the ability to
>"update" across yearly releases? (You volunteered last June ... maybe
>you could report on how that is going? :)

I volunteer because we have the requirement from our customers of QNX
Momentics. We test upgrading from one release to the next and report any
errors we find. So far, we haven¹t seen any with Neon.

>
>   All, please read the important sections about requiring "Type B" IP
>process (status quo assumed, for now) and Dani's role as "Java 9
>coordinator" for a quick July update specifically for Java 9 support.
>(That is, while Dani is "coordinator", I am sure he would appreciate
>input as to what "Java 9 support" should mean for the Sim. Release repo
>and EPP packages.)
>
>Thanks all,
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list
>eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
>https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council
>
>IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to
>the Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this list, you
>must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.