Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
[eclipse.org-planning-council] Release train wiki pages


I finally got tired today of trying to remember for the Nth time when a particular simultaneous release came out, or the exact order of releases. So, I created a simple wiki page with a high level summary of the existing simultaneous releases:

http://wiki.eclipse.org/Simultaneous_Release

It was surprisingly hard to track down all that release information, so I think it will prove useful. Feel free to edit/correct/augment this page, although I think it's best to keep it as short as possible so that it provides a quick "at a glance" summary.  Also with the help of Remy Suen the wiki template wizard, I added a simple succession box at the bottom of each release main wiki page so that it is easy to navigate between the different releases.

One thing I noticed while doing this, is that we have many terms for our release train: "simultaneous release", "coordinated release", "annual release", "release train", etc. I think we should strive to use a consistent term to avoid confusion for the wider community, and I somewhat arbitrarily picked "simultaneous release" for this wiki page. If other council members have thoughts on this please chime in - we can perhaps discuss at the next call if it proves to be worthy of debate.

I was also asked if it is correct to say "The Eclipse Foundation produces a simultaneous release". I think this is right, as I believe the planning council and committer members are "part of" the Eclipse Foundation. We tend to equate "Eclipse Foundation" with "Eclipse Management Organization (EMO)", but I think these are distinct entities (the EMO being a small but important element of the overall Foundation). Am I splitting hairs here? Would it be better to say "The Eclipse community produces a simultaneous release"? This doesn't seem right either, as anybody using or talking about Eclipse is in some way part of the Eclipse community. Please dive in to correct me here...

John

Back to the top