Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Re:[eclipse.org-architecture-council] StAC Teleconference andMeeting at EclipseCon

Just don't hold your AC/PC meeting while the EclipseCon Program Committee is having their "meeting" on Sunday. I'm sure many members would be conflicted between "doing the right thing(s) for the good of us all" and "free beer".


From: eclipse.org-planning-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:eclipse.org-planning-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Oberhuber, Martin
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 8:30 AM
To: eclipse.org-planning-council; eclipse.org-architecture-council
Cc: eclipse.org-requirements-council
Subject: RE: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Re:[eclipse.org-architecture-council] StAC Teleconference andMeeting at EclipseCon

On the Architecture Council, I do think we'll have things to discuss that may be of less interest to non members, but on the other hand I realise that many AC members are on the PC as well, so they would have a conflict anyways (and I don't think we'll have secrets that we cannot share with the other councils).
 
A joint meeting seems a great idea, let's make sure we have a good agenda to fill the 2 hours wisely and perhaps plan for breakout sessions. I'll also have this discussed at the AC phone meeting on Thursday.
 
The AC preliminary agenda is here: http://wiki.eclipse.org/Architecture_Council/F2F_EclipseCon_2009
 
Thanks,
--
Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River
Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm
 
 


From: eclipse.org-planning-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:eclipse.org-planning-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Markus Knauer
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 2:51 PM
To: eclipse.org-architecture-council
Cc: eclipse.org-requirements-council; eclipse.org-planning-council
Subject: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] StAC Teleconference and Meeting at EclipseCon

Yes, I agree, a joint meeting of all council sounds like a good proposal to me, because that Sunday is almost always filled up with last minute preparations and other meetings as well.

Markus

2009/1/13 Richard Gronback <richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>
The Planning Council was planning to meet the Sunday before EclipseCon, though I feel a well-attended StAC meeting with representation from all Councils may be a better use of our time, while giving us the opportunity to discuss what was likely to be on our agenda anyway.

Does the rest of the Planning Council agree with this?

Thanks,
Rich



On 1/13/09 7:54 AM, "Donald Smith" <donald.smith@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Councils,
 
First, some good news.  The 2009 program plan allocates a budget for the EMO to use towards the theme of "ensuring a great release train"  based on advice and prioritization of the StAC (i.e., the three councils [1]).  Based on the StAC's feedback and suggestions, we can fund efforts to help with Galileo, or if timing does not support priorities we can start looking to the 2010 release train.  Purely hypothetical examples to show the things we could do include fund a usability study, work on cross project testing, etc.
 
To start this process, I would like to schedule an initial call immediately after the Architecture Council call this Thursday January 15th, on the same bridge.  Time would be 9am Pacific, noon eastern,  1700 UTC.
http://wiki.eclipse.org/StAC_090115_Minutes
 
I realize this is short notice – but I hope that the timing after the Architecture Call will help.  The agenda for the 15th is to outline some of the constraints and decide how aggressive we want to be on helping Galileo versus the next release train.  We will also schedule a follow up the week of January 26th where I hope we will be able to firm a proposal of recommended priorities.
 
On the wiki you can find details of a SWOT analysis of the release train that may help guide our decision making: http://wiki.eclipse.org/StAC_081028_Minutes
 
Finally, I would like to propose we plan a meeting at EclipseCon from 3pm-5pm on Sunday, March 22nd.  The purpose of this meeting will be related to decisions made for the StAC budget.
 
-         Don


[1] - http://wiki.eclipse.org/StAC
 
Donald Smith
Director of Ecosystem Development
Eclipse Foundation, Inc.
P:+1 613 224 9461 x231
C:+1 613 292 5160
F:+1 212 918 1619
EclipseCon 2009 <http://eclipse.org/go/EC_SITE@IS> , March 23-26



_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council

IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.

_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council

IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.



--
Markus Knauer
EclipseSource
###   phone: +49 721 664 733 0  (GMT +1)
###     fax: +49 721 664 733 29
###     web: www.eclipsesource.com

Innoopract Informationssysteme GmbH
Stephanienstrasse 20, 76133 Karlsruhe Germany
General Manager: Jochen Krause
Registered Office: Karlsruhe, Commercial Register Mannheim HRB 107883


Back to the top