RE: [eclipse.org-planning-council] A suggested topic for Planning Council Discussion |
I’m not sure the Board would agree
that this isn’t about business. At the end of the day the Board decides.
But I assume they’d have someone doing the leg work of setting things up and
laying out the decisions. Doug Schaefer, QNX Software Systems From: eclipse.org-planning-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:eclipse.org-planning-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Scott Lewis Hi Doug, The point is to raise the quality perception of Eclipse in
the marketplace, i.e., beat NetBeans (and for my community, be as good as
Visual Studio). Nothing changes to the train and its current operation. This is
more an addition for those projects who want and need to work at addressing
these issues.
The process for managing these products
needs to be open just like everything else in Eclipse.
But depending on what we’re trying
to achieve strategically, some components would end up not making the cut, just
like in the “real” world (been there, done that, i.e. been cut, its
just part of doing business).
|