|Re: [eclipse.org-planning-council] A suggested topic for PlanningCouncil Discussion|
Doug Schaefer wrote:
I don't believe this is a good idea. Why? Because all it does is move the problem of selection/exclusion to another body (the EPP project). Currently the EPP selection criteria are (IMHO) pretty closed. That is, up to this point, the EPP project team members and/or EF select the contents of the packages (the individual projects) with whatever criteria they have chosen. There's a discussion on the epp project newsgroup about the future EPP selection criteria here:
(It's thread entitled 'Policies for EPP' started by Ian)
I guess I see having two tiers (an EF set of 'products' and then a set of 'projects') as inherently a non-level playing field...to re-use Doug's observation.