|Re: [eclipse.org-planning-council] A suggested topic for PlanningCouncil Discussion|
Mike Milinkovich wrote:
It seems to me this is a Board issue. The projects/committers can't fix this scaling problem, move their own projects forward, and follow the IP rules at the same time. Further, even if the number of Ganymede projects is limited in some way (to some number less than 30) then it seems to me chances are next year there will be a larger/unmanageable number of CQs just from those projects.
If the Board wants a higher level of process maturity and overall quality for the release train, then why don't they do something more than mandate that the projects (via e.g. integration testing) and EMO (IP) must do more with the same resources?