[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [eclipse.org-feep-stakeholders] (Only?) Choose FEEP items according to bugzilla votes and popularty?
|
I agree to that proposal (to some extend). One example (reason) why I’d prefer to have that:
I’d like to see improvements on JDT Null Annotations (crowdsourcing, shared repos etc., see the Mattermost channel [1] for more details). But I don’t know how many people would like the (alternative) approaches and in general would find this a good idea. Some kind of voting system would help to figure out how big the interest of that actually is and whats the preferred implementation strategy.
[1] https://mattermost.eclipse.org/eclipse/channels/jdt-null-analysis
> On 21 Nov 2016, at 11:44, Mickael Istria <mistria@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> If we want to make users feel like the have some control on the Eclipse technologies with the FEEP program, why not just make the FEEP list fund/reward bugs with the highest number of votes, duplicates, watchers... ? I believe this is the most objective data we have of how many people care about a bug, and it would IMHO be very nice to consider these community indicators as the main way to decide FEEP items, rather than creating new items (and maybe problems?) for FEEP.
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Mickael Istria
> Eclipse developer for Red Hat Developers
> My blog - My Tweets
> _______________________________________________
> eclipse.org-feep-stakeholders mailing list
> eclipse.org-feep-stakeholders@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-feep-stakeholders
--
Codetrails GmbH
The knowledge transfer company
Robert-Bosch-Str. 7, 64293 Darmstadt
Phone: +49-6151-276-7092
Mobile: +49-179-131-7721
http://www.codetrails.com/
Managing Director: Dr. Marcel Bruch
Handelsregister: Darmstadt HRB 91940
