The only reason that comes into my mind is the hence Eclipse 4 contains a lot of modelling content, it was created by "modelling people". Not all modelling people where involved but Eclipse 4 committers needed to know what EMF is and all these. (most of them at least)
There is a chance that these people will be at the modelling symposium. Wouldnt that mean that we run the Eclipse 5 talk without the people that created Eclipse 4 ?
(I have people like Tom Schindl and Eric Moffat in my mind)....
Is that just me ?
christian
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von:
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Martin Lippert
Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. August 2012 17:44
An: Eclipsecon Program Committee list
Betreff: Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] feedback regarding Eclipse 5 talk
Hey!
just for me to understand that. Why would that be at the end of the day.
This year we will only have BoFs at the end of the first day. So
putting the Eclipse 5 talk on the first day is fine. Putting it "on
the end" would mean that it overlaps with the Modelling Symposium
which is also at the end of the first day.
That in my opinion would be unfortunate (unless we want Eclipse 5 to
contain no modelling at all :-) ).
I guess what you meant is "Eclipse 5" should be somewhere say in the
afternoon of the first day. (Morning is tutorial anyway)
John suggested to put the talk at the end of a day in order to have some more time after the talk for possible discussions (kind of a similar reason why we put the modeling symposium there)... ;-)
I understand your opinion about not having in parallel with the modeling symposium, but doesn't that mean we shouldn't put the Eclipse 5 talk in parallel with any talk? (I guess it will be a hard competition anyway, why is the modeling symposium special there?)
-Martin
Right ?
christian
Am 14.08.12 17:21 schrieb "Martin Lippert" unter <lippert@xxxxxxx>:
Hey!
I got an answer from John regarding the Eclipse 5 talk and he is
happy with keeping this as a standard talk with a subsequent BoF
session. So scheduling this talk at the end of the day would make much sense.
Cheers,
-Martin
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-progr
am-co
mmittee
-------------------------------------------------------------
compeople AG
Untermainanlage 8
60329 Frankfurt/Main
fon: +49 (0) 69 / 27 22 18 0
fax: +49 (0) 69 / 27 22 18 22
web: http://www.compeople.de/
Vorstand: Jürgen Wiesmaier
Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Christian Glanz
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Frankfurt/Main
Handelsregister Frankfurt HRB 56759
USt-IdNr. DE207665352
-------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-progra
m-committee
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxxhttps://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-------------------------------------------------------------
compeople AG
Untermainanlage 8
60329 Frankfurt/Main
fon: +49 (0) 69 / 27 22 18 0
fax: +49 (0) 69 / 27 22 18 22
web: http://www.compeople.de/
Vorstand: Jürgen Wiesmaier
Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Christian Glanz
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Frankfurt/Main
Handelsregister Frankfurt HRB 56759
USt-IdNr. DE207665352
-------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee
