Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] feedback regarding Eclips

["Campo, Christian" <Christian.Campo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

The only reason that comes into my mind is the hence Eclipse 4 contains a lot of modelling content, it was created by "modelling people". Not all modelling people where involved but Eclipse 4 committers needed to know what EMF is and all these. (most of them at least)

There is a chance that these people will be at the modelling symposium. Wouldnt that mean that we run the Eclipse 5 talk without the people that created Eclipse 4 ?

(I have people like Tom Schindl and Eric Moffat in my mind)....

Is that just me ?

christian

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Martin Lippert
Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. August 2012 17:44
An: Eclipsecon Program Committee list
Betreff: Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] feedback regarding Eclipse 5 talk

Hey!

> just for me to understand that. Why would that be at the end of the day.
> This year we will only have BoFs at the end of the first day. So
> putting the Eclipse 5 talk on the first day is fine. Putting it "on
> the end" would mean that it overlaps with the Modelling Symposium
> which is also at the end of the first day.
>
> That in my opinion would be unfortunate (unless we want Eclipse 5 to
> contain no modelling at all :-) ).
>
> I guess what you meant is "Eclipse 5" should be somewhere say in the
> afternoon of the first day. (Morning is tutorial anyway)

John suggested to put the talk at the end of a day in order to have some more time after the talk for possible discussions (kind of a similar reason why we put the modeling symposium there)... ;-)

I understand your opinion about not having in parallel with the modeling symposium, but doesn't that mean we shouldn't put the Eclipse 5 talk in parallel with any talk? (I guess it will be a hard competition anyway, why is the modeling symposium special there?)

-Martin



> Right ?
>
> christian
>
> Am 14.08.12 17:21 schrieb "Martin Lippert" unter <lippert@xxxxxxx>:
>
>> Hey!
>>
>> I got an answer from John regarding the Eclipse 5 talk and he is
>> happy with keeping this as a standard talk with a subsequent BoF
>> session. So scheduling this talk at the end of the day would make much sense.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> -Martin
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list
>> eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-progr
>> am-co
>> mmittee
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> compeople AG
> Untermainanlage 8
> 60329 Frankfurt/Main
> fon: +49 (0) 69 / 27 22 18 0
> fax: +49 (0) 69 / 27 22 18 22
> web: http://www.compeople.de/
>
> Vorstand: Jürgen Wiesmaier
> Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Christian Glanz
>
> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Frankfurt/Main
> Handelsregister Frankfurt HRB 56759
> USt-IdNr. DE207665352
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list
> eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-progra
> m-committee
>
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee

-------------------------------------------------------------
compeople AG
Untermainanlage 8
60329 Frankfurt/Main
fon: +49 (0) 69 / 27 22 18 0
fax: +49 (0) 69 / 27 22 18 22
web: http://www.compeople.de/

Vorstand: Jürgen Wiesmaier
Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Christian Glanz

Sitz der Gesellschaft: Frankfurt/Main
Handelsregister Frankfurt HRB 56759
USt-IdNr. DE207665352
-------------------------------------------------------------