I think thats a
great idea. So showing the top 3 or 5 is a good thing.....
There are two concerns I have:
1. Having a 4.6 (as an example) with 2 votes is totally
different from 4.6. with 20 votes. We might want to have a
minimum number of votes (4, 7, 10 whaever) before a talk is
considered as getting into the top 5. (These rules can be
public)
2. As much as I love Ian's blog :-) , posting the 5 top
scorer there or on the eclipse website is not the same as
calling the speakers up on stage in the closing session. That
would be really cool, I believe.
Maybe we can work on making that happen in future
EclipseCon's.
christian
Am 10.11.2011 um 19:07 schrieb Ian Skerrett:
As an idea, would the
PC like to recognize the 'top' speakers, something like
the JavaOne rock stars?
On 11/10/2011 9:56 AM, Christopher Guindon wrote:
Hello everyone,
I've create a page for the PC to review the average
result for each talk. You can access this page using the
following URL :
http://www.eclipsecon.org/europe2011/evaluation/all
Please don't hesitate to contact me with any questions
or feedback!
Thank you
<ATT00001..c>
-------------------------------------------------------------
compeople AG
Untermainanlage 8
60329 Frankfurt/Main
fon: +49 (0) 69 / 27 22
18 0
fax: +49 (0) 69 / 27 22 18 22
web: www.compeople.de
Vorstand: Jürgen Wiesmaier
Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Christian Glanz
Sitz der
Gesellschaft: Frankfurt/Main
Handelsregister Frankfurt HRB 56759
Ust-Ident.-Nr: DE207665352
-------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee