| RE: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Organizing the Panels |
RE: Making Money from Open Source
Still think it is a good idea, but I have been too busy trying to make money from open source to put together any talks about it. If someone is passionate about this, take it away. Otherwise given the lack of available time, I think this one should be deferred.
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Oisin Hurley
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 11:17 AM
To: Eclipsecon Program Committee list
Subject: Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Organizing the Panels
Starter material for the call. Each Panel must have:
1. Someone who is responsible for it. This persons name
will appear as the 'author' in the submission system.
2. A Moderator - this person is to be listed in the 'abstract'
part in the submission system
3. Confirmed Participants - these people are to be list in
the 'abstract' part of the submission system.
4. Topics of conversation - the scope and charter type of
thing.
1209 - Ask The AC Panel
Agreed that this one should go ahead? Wayne gets to be
the Man In Charge. Needs to choose moderator and update
entry in submission system. Wayne - this is because you
are on the PC and Martin isn't.
1211 - Eclipse for Mobile Application Development Panel
Agreed that this one should go ahead? Eric is moderator, but
I suggest that Doug be Man In Charge. Need to add participants
and update submission.
1237 - Application Models for OSGi BoF
This is a BoF, more on those separately
1347 - The Coalition Against EMF
I think that this should be rolled in with the Modeling Panel, myself,
to make the discussion a bit more interesting. So - proposal to drop
this one.
1441 - Developing at Eclipse
Agreed that this one should go ahead? Wayne is M-i-C. Needs
moderator, participants and submission system update.
1442 - Build and Continuous Integration with Eclipse
Agreed that this one should go ahead? I think this one is a
must-have. Wayne is M-i-C again. Moderator required, with
martial arts skills, also participants and update of submission
system.
1455 - Scraping the Barnacles - What parts of Eclipse...
I think this one belongs to the Developing at Eclipse Panel
rather than having its own dedicated one. M-i-C of that
panel should contact Shaun for someone to come on
board - discuss.
1456 - I Love This Project, But Where Are The Docs?
I love docs, but this reads more like BoF material than
panel material. What do you think?
1525 - Testing and TDD - the Good, the Bad and the Ugly
I'm not sure if Dave Carver suggested dropping this one
in a recent mail - let's discuss.
1528 - Eclipse Modeling Panel
I think we should definitely have a modeling panel. I suggest
that we mix in someone from 1347 so that it's not just all
unicorns pooping rainbows (btw same goes for all other
panels, I'm not singling out modeling for this). Bernd is
M-i-C : need moderator, participants and update to the
submission system.
NaN - The Future of App Servers -> not in the system
I propose we take this on - we have some promises of
participation from SAP and RedHat. More would be nice
and there was talk previously of title changes. Need a
M-i-C - so I'm soliciting volunteers.
NaN - Future Timelines for Open Source -> not in the system
Working title only. Would like to get some analyst wonks
and journos that spend time on this stuff to answer questions
to a crowd. Could be useful since these guys may be on-site
already and ergo cheap. We are short on space so need to
discuss.
NaN - Making Money from Open Source -> not in the system
This might be interesting - nontech focus, but the kind of
discussion that is useful for all attendees. Scott was the one
that suggested this, so he gets the M-i-C. Let's discuss.
NaN - Eclipse for the Future - e4 -> not in the system
I think maybe this would be better served by a BoF, to be
honest.
NaN - OSGi on the Server -> could be 1237?
Same goes for this - better as a BoF, I think, because it
will actively discuss solutions.
On the call, lets go through these. I'll then summarize to the
list for those that can't make the call time.
cheers
--oh
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee