Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] EclipseCon Deciders Call #3 : Fri 8jan10 1100est Summary

As an aside to the Keynote question, it should be noted that Jason definitely has extensive speaking experience from OSCON, to JAX, to EclipseWorld, to JavaPolis, etc.  That’s just off the top of my head.  I’ve seen him speak multiple times and would rank him quite high.

 

I’d defer to Scott and others as to if the abstract is worthy and not just a general-BIRT-ish talk.

 

-          Don

 

From: Content-filter at foundation.eclipse.org [mailto:postmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Doug Schaefer
Sent: January 8, 2010 8:24 PM
To: Eclipsecon Program Committee list
Subject: Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] EclipseCon Deciders Call #3 : Fri 8jan10 1100est Summary

 

I decided on no extended talks for CDT and neither for Mobile and Embedded. Since we nave such few slots, I think extended talks need to be keynote quality. Is this talk keynote quality?

On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 6:54 PM, Oisin Hurley <oisin.hurley@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I think Scott makes a good case here. I have a couple
of remarks.

1. That the talks are planned with the community, ergo they are
effectively filtered already - but not all communities can attempt
that level of organization. This skews the process of selection,
I think, relative to the more 'open it up and pile on' approaches of
larger and more diverse projects.

Should future conferences plan for this kind of difference?

2. The figures on the spreadsheet for the activity on groups don't
have a time window, so I would suggest that the older the project
the higher it is up the list :)  Not saying this is the case with BIRT,
but just a general comment.

Year-on-year activity is probably a better indicator than cumulative
activity since inception.

Don says he can work the scheduling, but of course adding the talk
as extended would mean a cut of 1 standard talk and the non-replacement
of the moved talk for the schedule to work. I would like to see
if we get some progress  done on the standard talks sheet first and
then come back to this.

Of course, I would like to get comments from the rest of the
committee please.

 cheers

 --oh
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee

 


Back to the top