Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] First Meeting

Apologies for missing the call, I made a mistake when copying the Google calendar information to my main calendar. I will make sure that this does not happen again.

I am only a Java developer :)

Boris

Inactive hide details for Scott Rosenbaum <scottr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>Scott Rosenbaum <scottr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


          Scott Rosenbaum <scottr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
          Sent by: eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

          08/03/2008 03:14 PM

          Please respond to
          Eclipsecon Program Committee list <eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To

Eclipsecon Program Committee list <eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx>

cc


Subject

Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] First Meeting

All,

Sorry for the confusion the time is:

10am EST
9am CST
8am MST
7am PST

I would do more but I am only a report developer.

Scott



Jeff McAffer wrote:
      Minor clarification. The call is at 10am *EST* correct? The google calendar has it at that time.

      Jeff

      Scott Rosenbaum wrote:
          EclipseCon Program Committee,

          The first program committee is scheduled for Tuesday, August 5 at 10 am CST. The call in info is:


          +1.613.287.8000 (Ottawa and international) or

          866.362.7064 (toll-free North America)
          passcode 874551#


          We will be referring to this
          google spread-sheet during the presentation please let me know if you can not see the sheet and I will send it as Excel.

          See below for the agenda (hopefully we can keep this to 30 minutes).


          Scott Rosenbaum


          Calendar





          Program

          - One fewer concurrent session - less is more
          - Tutorials are four hours instead of two - more opportunity to have hands on time. Invite commercial learning companies.
          - Moderated short talks versus open short talks
          - Short talk sessions are cohesive.
          - Moderator can change numbers of presenters (e.g. could be 1 long talk - discouraged)
          - Moderator adds consistency and flow, guides Q&A makes speaker intros
          - Main Stage Presentations - save this for the very best talks for your category

          Session Allocations

          - Two new categories: Runtime and E4
          - Reserved category: a pool of un-allocated sessions that will be given to the best remaining talks Group Vote
          - Fewer concurrent sessions + two new categories + reserved category = Fewer Sessions per Category
          - Goal was to be fair
          - There is no limit on the number of reserved talks that a category can pick up

          Committee Responsibilities

          - Create a category plan / description
          - Recruit exceptional speakers
          - Recruit moderators for short talks
          - Promote, recruit others to promote
          - Read submissions
          - provide feedback
          - consolidate, combine, and downgrade (Tutorial to long, long to short)
          - Fill Category allocations
          - Suggest entries for Reserved Sweepstake


          Keynotes

          - Each keynote will be a discussion between two domain experts
          - Wanted to bring it back to subjects that are more relevant for our community.
          - The Future of IDE: Tim Wagner & Kevin McGuire
          - Cloud Computing: Jeff Barr from Amazon Web Services with AWS client Heroku (Rails deployment)
          - Community and Communications: Clay Shirky and ...

          QUALITY, QUALITY, QUALITY
          - The program committee is responsible for presentation quality
          - The expectations for what you get for being there are going up
          - Expertise alone does not make a good presentation
          - A good subject will not overcome a boring or un-prepared presenter

          - How do we get not only good subjects, but great presenters?
          - There is no excuse for not being prepared, or not having a good presentation
          - Can we combine good presenters with strong technical experts (who may not speak as well)
          - Do we want a references section as part of the submission system?
          - Can we implement a presentation review system? (new presenters only?)
          - Tutorials only?
          - Main Stage too?


          Next Meeting
          -
          Category Descriptions - Complete?
          - Review submission system & discuss logistics
          - Main stage speaker ideas?
          - New Conference Ideas
          - how do we achieve more "You had to be there" moments
          - Try an Ignite Eclipse (a la
          Ignite) track
          - Try
          Eclipse Karakoe
          - Try
          Conference speed dating


           
          _______________________________________________
          eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list
          eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
          https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee
           



      _______________________________________________
      eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list
      eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
      https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee
       
      _______________________________________________
      eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list
      eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
      https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee

GIF image

GIF image

GIF image


Back to the top