So Long
EclipseCon 2008
Thanks to all of you for your feedback and participation on EclipseCon
2008. Based on the feedback that I got from my completely
un-scientific polling, this really was an awesome conference. Using
Bjorn's far more scientific evaluation system data, appears to confirm
this:
- 39% of
the talks had a 100% approval rating
- 65% of
the talks had better than 90% approval rating
- 80% of
the talks had better than 80% approval rating
I think that the
results indicate that the program committee must have been doing
something pretty well.
The non-scientific approach indicated that a lot of the other
activities such as foozball, x-box, poker, running, BOFs were extremely
popular. The response to the free tutorials was really positive too.
I have compiled / edited the comments all of your feedback out onto the
EclipseCon wiki here,
if you have additional feedback or didn't have time to peruse the
individual emails please have a look.
Hello EclipseCon 2009
For anyone that is not aware, I have agreed to be the 2009 Program
Chair. My hope is that all of you will be willing to help with next
years conference. If for some reason you do not wish to participate on
next years program committee, I would really appreciate your assistance
in recruiting your successor. If you can let me know by mid May it
will help me to keep things moving forward. If you would like to
contact directly you can email me at scottr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx or
call at 612 220 6006.
I have started to look at 2009 and have created a new section on the
EclipseCon wiki for 2009.
Right now my number one focus is to line up keynotes. I have started
to compile a list
of candidates. If you have ideas or opinions for next years
keynotes, please add them to the wiki. Bjorn and I have also started
to brainstorm on the ideas and planning for next year, feel free to add
your thoughts.
In terms of my goals for 2009, my number one goal is presentation
quality. I walk out of a great talk and I am energized and fired up
about our community and my involvement in it. I sit through a
dis-organized talk where the demos don't work, I am just glad that the
wireless works so well. The amazing thing is that the great speakers
transcend differing skill levels, backgrounds, etc. they just have
compelling talks.
My hope is that as you reflect on this years conference that you note
the truly exceptional speakers. How do we make sure that these
speakers are back next year. How do we make sure that these speakers
are recognized and promoted? Bjorn and I are a kicking around some
ideas on how we can feature these speakers in next years program, if
you have ideas please feel free to share them.
Finally, I will be blogging into Planet Eclipse on the EclipseCon
planning process. While respecting the committees need to have frank
deliberations of the merits of each speaker, I would like to make the
entire EclipseCon selection process as open as we can. EclipseCon
belongs to the entire community, I think that one of the key benefits
of an open process is the ownership that the participants take in the
process.
As Doug said in his debriefing notes: "Overall, this was my favorite EclipseCon so far. I’m
not sure if
it’s just because I was so involved or whether it was better this
year." My
thought is that the answer is yes on both counts, EclipseCon was better
because of his involvement. I hope that we can let all of our
participants feel that way.
Scott Rosenbaum
|