From the discussion on the “Developer Track
Subcommittee” telecon Monday evening. Partitioning the talks should help
us hone in on finalizing the long talk portion of the program. Note that not
all of these selections are finalized yet (because in some cases we need
project feedback, additional discussion, etc.)
This is a combination of project feedback, guesses (to be
confirmed this week at the Council meetings), already accepted talks, etc. (i.e.,
it’s not a vote).
Here’s a summary of the RCP and embedded
recommendation lists we’ve received:
- Embedded Short list Recs
mentioned below: 31, 214, 174, 284, 287
- Embedded Short list Recs not
mentioned below: 274
- RCP recs mentioned below: 116,
194, 195, 174
- RCP recs not mentioned below: 185,
199, 204, 137, 189, 283
Math: Assuming the allocations below, 90 short talks, and
the “long Thursday” option, (and my ability to add) we have 10
remaining slots to allocate. I believe we need more platform and “other”
topic, at least one talk on EMF, and possibly an additional RCP talk from the
recommended list above, since some of the ones on the virtual track now are
only partly about RCP. Given the difficulty of picking only 10 additional long talks,
we might want to consider trading in some short talks as well.
Please come to the Friday meeting with two nominations for
additional platform talks and two nominations for additional “other”
(non-project) talks. Register your interest with the flag system, and we’ll
try to make progress on selecting some additional talks in addition to the requests
from the projects.
And in case it’s useful, here’s a link to a
public vote-sorted display: http://canuck.gda.itesm.mx/eclipsezilla/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&component=Long%20Talk&long_desc_type=substring&long_desc=&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=SHEPHERD&bug_status=SCHEDULED&bug_status=REOPEN&bug_status=RESOLVED&emailassigned_to1=1&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailassigned_to2=1&emailreporter2=1&emailcc2=1&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0=&order=bugs.votes,map_assigned_to.realname%2Cbugs.votes%2Cmap_assigned_to.realname%2Cbugs.bug_id&query_based_on=
DSDP (allocation: 2)
- 284
- 287 or (if not voted on as a
platform talk) 31
Embedded Virtual Track / Conference Theme (additional
allocation: 2)
- 214
- 174
- 284 (accounted for under DSDP)
- 287 (accounted for under DSDP,
assuming we don’t use that slot for 31)
WTP (proposed allocation: 3)
- 49 [ACCEPTED]
- TBD – project request
(ETA Friday, owner Lawrence)
- TBD – project request
(ETA Friday, owner Lawrence)
TPTP (proposed allocation: 3)
- 102 [ACCEPTED]
- TBD – project request
(ETA Friday, owner Sri)
- TBD – project request
(ETA Friday, owner Sri)
STP (proposed allocation: 1)
- 235 (conjecture – to be
confirmed with Carl)
DTP (proposed allocation: 1)
- 199 (conjecture – to be
confirmed with John)
BIRT (proposed allocation: 2)
- 10 (conjecture – to be
confirmed with Wenfeng)
- 11 (conjecture – to be
confirmed with Wenfeng)
Platform (no specific allocation, but this
is definitely too few)
- 93 [ACCEPTED]
- 260 [ACCEPTED]
- 116 [ACCEPTED]
- 194 [ACCEPTED]
Technology (no specific allocation, but
this seems like too few)
Tools (no specific allocation, but EMF is
notably missing)
Non-Project Talks (apart from bus track)
(no specific allocation, but more would be good)
Business Track (allocation: 8)
- 208 [ACCEPTED]
- 306 [ACCEPTED]
- 307 [ACCEPTED]
- 311 [ACCEPTED]
- 325 [ACCEPTED]
- The
BEA-Shane-talk-without-a-number [ACCEPTED]
- TBD (268?)
- TBD (289?)
EMO “Reserved” Talks:
(allocation: 3; not under our control)
- TBD by EMO
- TBD by EMO
- TBD by EMO
RCP Virtual Track / Conference Theme (additional
allocation: 0)
- 195 [ACCEPTED]
- 115 [ACCEPTED]
- 116 [ACCEPTED]
- 194 [ACCEPTED]
- 174