Your Committer Board representatives (Kai, Jeff, Scott and Tim) would
to solicit your participation in the review and revision of the Eclipse
The changes to the development process are significant, and tackle
and long awaited issues such as project mentoring, incubation, and
reviews. It is important that we get this right and thus want to
you to actively participate in the revision process by reviewing and
comments/suggestions in areas where you feel it is needed.
You can provide comments and suggestions directly via the wiki, and/or
via us if
Kai-Uwe Maetzel: kai-uwe_maetzel@xxxxxxxxxx
Jeff McAffer: Jeff_McAffer@xxxxxxxxxx
Scott Lewis: slewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Tim Wagner: twagner@xxxxxxx
Also, Jeff, Scott, and Bjorn are at the Eclipse Summit Europe this
week, and would like to chat face-to-face about this or other committer
concerns/issues if you are attending.
Kai, Jeff, Scott, and Tim
Bjorn Freeman-Benson wrote:
Members and Committers,
Together with the Board, I've been working on a new revision of the
The goal of this revision is update the process-as-written to match the
process-as-practiced. We've also added a new section about mentorship
and a requirement that projects get a public review at least annually.
we'd like your comments and suggestions. The draft process is on the
wiki. Feel free to insert comments and discussion - my goal is that
final process be our collective best effort and desires and not just a
make-work process that gets ignored.
Our next couple of weeks
I'll be blogging
about different sections of the process - explaining
why we've worded it the way we have and what we hope the result will
be. Follow on our blog
or Planet Eclipse.
eclipse.org-committers mailing list