[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] PMC or parent TLP-less projects
|
The role of the PMC is baked into our Bylaws and our IP Policy.
Changing or removing the role of PMCs would be a very large task,
and goes well beyond simply changing the EDP.
On 2022-06-02 6:18 a.m., Mickael Istria
wrote:
Hi all,
We discussed in some not too old call the capability of
having projects without a PMC, or could we say being their own
PMC, their own top-level project and thus being more
autonomous on many things
How feasible would that be? Any idea when this can be
implemented?
I'm asking that because these days, I think the Technology
PMC is a bottleneck in m2e development; and I don't remember
the Technology PMC has not created any value for the m2e
project for a long time. So m2e would be better without having
to deal with Technology PMC.
Note that it's not blaming the Technology PMC and its
members in any way, same could be said for some other projects
and other PMCs, it just happen that m2e is my current example.
This is more discussing the concept of PMC or having a parent
Top Level Project not being best for m2e -and probably others-
in general.
Cheers,
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council
--
Mike Milinkovich
Executive Director | Eclipse Foundation AISBL
Twitter:@mmilinkov