Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [] Download stats reliability and SLA

This is not something the AC owns. It's entirely owned by the Webmaster team - defining SLA and collecting data.


Gunnar Wagenknecht

> On Mar 16, 2020, at 18:53, Mickael Istria <mistria@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Architecture Council,
> I'm curious about how reliable are the download stats and what's the SLA we should expect from it in term of support to project trying to leverage them.
> There were some discussions on another ide-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing-list where the download stats were challenged by some people who think they're more or less not worth checking/trusting. Also I've opened a bug some time ago about download stats that seem fishy (note that it can totally be an issue on my end, but I fail at finding what it is), and didn't receive any support so far. It's a bit disappointing, but am I right to be disappointed or are download stats a service that's ultimately not really supported by EMO and I just have too high expectations?
> In any case, can we have the related "SLA" and reliability made explicit and ideally referenced on the download stats page?
> Cheers,
> -- 
> Mickael Istria
> Eclipse IDE developer, for Red Hat Developers
> _______________________________________________
> mailing list
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit

Back to the top