Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [] Impossible to find subset of "aggregated" CQs to piggy-back

Open a bug against Community/IPZilla


On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 12:56 PM Mickael Istria <mistria@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 6:43 PM Wayne Beaton <wayne.beaton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It is not intended that anybody piggyback this style of aggregate CQ.

That's too bad.
So if one needs a subset of the CQ, instead of doing a piggy-back, this will require a new CQ and duplicate work from committer and IP team?

This is a relatively new exception/workaround that we still need to document.

Ok. Is the code of available somewhere so we could make a PR to document that on the entry point? It seems to be a fairly important and powerful use-case many projects will like to take advantage of from now on.

The short version is this:
  • One CQ may contain many or all of the dependencies
  • Node.js dependencies only
  • The CQ must be "Type A"
  • Attach the sources for all dependencies as a single ZIP file
  • The CQ is tied to a specific project; no piggybacks.
Ok for the current state.
However, I think this could be improved by allowing piggy-back (see my 1st question) to hopefully reduce the workload on committers and IP team.
_______________________________________________ mailing list

IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.


Wayne Beaton

Director of Open Source Projects | Eclipse Foundation, Inc.

Meet us at EclipseCon Europe 2018: LUDWIGSBURG, OCTOBER 23 - 25

Back to the top