Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] 8-Sep AC Meeting Notes
Reply-To: Eclipse Architecture Council <eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, September 9, 2016 at 4:50 AM
To: Eclipse Architecture Council <eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] 8-Sep AC Meeting Notes

Hi Doug

I suggest to have the discussions for the UI guidelines on https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ui-best-practices-working-group. Those from the Architecture Council and IDE mailing lists can join there.

Excellent! Thank you.



As for my AI regarding FEEP: I see two choices: have a UI designer just clean up what we have already, e.g. replace outdated examples and screenshots with what we shipped in Neon. That way it won't look like a dead document anymore. Or we wait until we have some concrete changes that we want to see applied to the document.

I’m not sure it’s urgent. It would be good to have the examples/screenshots updated though so it’s up to date. We may be a while before we reach any decisions on anything larger.



Dani



From:        Doug Schaefer <dschaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:        "eclipse.org-architecture-council" <eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:        08.09.2016 20:49
Subject:        Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] 8-Sep AC Meeting Notes
Sent by:        eclipse.org-architecture-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx



Hey gang, as Martin noted, I’ll be driving a renewed effort with a committee studying and providing UI Guidelines and more generally User Experience Guidelines that we would want all projects, internal and third party, to follow when contributing to the Eclipse IDE User Interface.

I need to figure out a couple of logistics but look for an e-mail here where I will ask for volunteers to help contribute ideas to the effort. This really needs to be a community effort so we can maximize peer pressure to help projects do the right thing, so I may expand it to more than just the Architecture Council at least for input. At times, making decisions will be hard, but we need to have a strong front to make a difference and not everyone will be happy as individuals. Hopefully we can all rise above that and focus on the end goal of making the Eclipse IDE a world leader again.

More when I figure out how to proceed. But really looking forward to what we can achieve.

Doug.

From: <eclipse.org-architecture-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of "Oberhuber, Martin" <Martin.Oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: Eclipse Architecture Council <eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thursday, September 8, 2016 at 12:50 PM
To: Eclipse Architecture Council <eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] 8-Sep AC Meeting Notes

Hi all,
 
Notes of today’s meeting are now online:
https://wiki.eclipse.org/Architecture_Council/Meetings/September_8_2016
 
Interesting follow-up to expect – read the notes for details J
 
Thanks,
Martin
--
Martin Oberhuber, SMTS / Product Owner – Development Tools, Wind River
direct +43.662.457915.85  fax +43.662.457915.6
 _______________________________________________
eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council

IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.

Back to the top