|Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] EclipseCon 2016 AC/PC session|
Hey! I agree with David, I am not in favor of a panel discussion unless we have something controversial or forward-leading to discuss there. I am not sure what Tyler is going to talk about in his keynote about the future of IDEs. That might be an interesting topic for a panel on Thursday (discussing the fall-out of that keynote), but that highly depends on the content of the keynote and what the architecture council have to say about that. But maybe that is a different panel discussion then, not the meet-the-architecture-council thing, but more something like “what do you think about the future of IDEs”, probably with a different set of panelists than purely the AC. Just some thoughts… Cheers, -Martin > Am 18.01.2016 um 23:03 schrieb Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > > Greetings folks. > > As we discussed on last Thursday's call, we have a big chunk of time set aside for the Architecture and Planning Councils to meet during the conference: we overlap with the session slots on Thursday (10:30-12:35 & 13:45-15:05). We'll have lunch with the rest of the conference attendees. > > I'm thinking that it might be cool to have open Q&A sessions and invite the community to join us in the afternoon (e.g. one for the AC and one for the PC). We might consider live streaming these sessions via Google Hangout or something. > > 10:30-12:35: General discussion (closed session). Role of the Architecture Council, Evolution of the Eclipse Development Process, Eclipse IDE as a product, FEEP priorities > 12:35-13:45: Lunch > 13:45-14:20: Planning Council Q&A Panel. Changes to the release schedule, joining the simultaneous release, the future of Orbit > 14:30-15:05: Architecture Q&A Panel. Eclipse Development Process, technical discussion > > The topics listed here are just ideas off the top of my head. The timing seems like a natural fit to me, but we can tweak everything. I welcome your input. > > The Thursday session schedule is here: > > https://www.eclipsecon.org/na2016/conference/schedule/session/2016-03-10 > > Note that, if we're going to do a panel discussion, we'll need to decide fairly quickly to make sure that we allocate an appropriately-sized room. > > Note also that I haven't discussed this with the Planning Council yet, but I'm pretty sure that most of the PC is represented on this list anyway. I do intend to bring this formally to the PC later this week, so please provide your input sooner rather than later. > > Thoughts? > > Wayne > -- > Wayne Beaton > @waynebeaton > The Eclipse Foundation > <38x138_0.jpg> > _______________________________________________ > eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list > eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council > > IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation. To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.
Back to the top